Decades of clinical research

IVC: published evidence since 1988

Intravaginal culture is not experimental. It has a decades‑long track record, with published studies from multiple global centres and growing clinical data from Southeast Asia.

"Fertilisation rates with IVC were comparable to conventional IVF, while blastulation rates were significantly higher."

Malaysia IVC Study, 2021

Comparable outcomes. Simpler delivery.

Comparable pregnancy rates

Published data from large series worldwide show pregnancy and live birth rates in a similar range to conventional IVF for carefully selected patients, while using a very different laboratory footprint.

High patient satisfaction

In a 2022 Malaysian study, 78% of patients said they would recommend IVC to others — driven by the personal, body-centred nature of the process and its relative accessibility.

Strong blastulation data

The same Malaysian study found that blastulation rates with IVC were significantly higher than with conventional IVF — suggesting the body's natural environment may support early embryo development.

Real‑world global track record

IVC has been used and studied in multiple centres worldwide over more than three decades. Published literature documents thousands of births, with a safety and outcomes track record that spans continents.

¹ Ranoux C. et al., Lancet 1988  |  All clinical data references available upon request.
Backed by
Hong Kong Science and Technology Park HKSTP